Tag: survivor voices

  • Do I Believe in Karma

    Do I Believe in Karma

    Do you believe in karma?

    I don’t think it’s that simple.

    We like the idea of karma because it makes the world feel fair.

    Do good, and good will eventually find you.

    Cause harm, and somehow, somewhere, life will make you answer for it.

    But I’ve lived long enough to know that life doesn’t always work like that.

    I’ve watched good people suffer because of things they never caused, never deserved and could not have prevented.

    I’ve watched people carry trauma created entirely by somebody else’s choices.

    And I’ve watched people do hideous things and seemingly walk away from them.

    So where is the karma in that?

    If a good person is harmed, traumatised and left rebuilding their life while the person who caused it carries on as normal, are we really supposed to believe the universe has somehow balanced the scales?

    I don’t.

    At least, not in the traditional sense.

    Maybe karma isn’t punishment.

    Maybe it isn’t some invisible court where every wrong eventually receives an equal sentence.

    Maybe sometimes there simply isn’t justice.

    That is uncomfortable to admit, particularly when you have spent years waiting for accountability.

    But perhaps there is another way of looking at it.

    The person who harmed you does not get to decide who you become afterwards.

    They may have changed your life. They may have left consequences they never have to carry themselves. They may never fully understand the damage they caused.

    But surviving does something too.

    You learn.

    You rebuild.

    You become more discerning about who gets access to you.

    You recognise things you once overlooked.

    You speak when you once stayed silent.

    Sometimes you even take what nearly destroyed you and turn it into something that helps somebody else survive.

    That isn’t karma.

    And I don’t particularly like calling it a “lesson”, either. Some things should never have happened in the first place.

    It is simply what human beings can sometimes do with what remains.

    So, do I believe in karma?

    Not really.

    I believe actions have consequences — although frustratingly, those consequences don’t always land on the person who caused the harm.

    I believe accountability matters precisely because we cannot rely on the universe to provide it.

    And I believe being a good person does not guarantee you a painless life.

    Perhaps the better question isn’t whether the people who hurt us eventually get what they deserve.

    Perhaps it’s whether we can reach a point where their future no longer determines ours.

    Because I don’t want to spend the rest of my life waiting for karma.

    I’ve already spent enough of it waiting.

    NAAVoices.com

  • Heart of the Beast (2026): Why Brad Pitt’s New Film Gets PTSD Right

    Heart of the Beast (2026): Why Brad Pitt’s New Film Gets PTSD Right

    The best portrayal of PTSD I have ever seen in a film

    I thought I was going to watch a survival film. I didn’t expect to recognise survival itself.

    Spoiler warning: This piece discusses themes and events from Heart of the Beast.
    Content note: PTSD, combat trauma, grief, and animals in distress. No graphic personal account of abuse. If you need support while reading, skip to the directory at the end.

    9–14 minutes

    I went in expecting Brad Pitt, the Alaskan wilderness, a dog, and a physical fight to stay alive. Heart of the Beast, directed by David Ayer and written by Cameron Alexander, delivers all of that on the surface. Pitt plays James Belmont, a former Special Forces soldier stranded in the Alaskan wilderness with his combat dog, Odin. Released by Paramount, it’s an adventure thriller about endurance and the bond between man and dog, while early reviews have already noted the quiet thread of combat trauma running underneath.

    The setup is simple: a seaplane crash leaves James and Odin alone in terrain that would kill most people and most dogs. A trek of around 50 miles through brutal weather, wildlife, injury, and exhaustion. The film gives you the survival story you came for, but it also gives you something else, something quieter, something that doesn’t announce itself.

    It gives you recognition.

    Home, in this film, isn’t comfort. It’s recognition. James isn’t surrounded by people; he’s pulled into the wild with Odin, doing the next necessary thing. It’s a hard kind of belonging, not safety, but familiarity. The body knowing the work.

    Before the film even started, there was an armed forces recruitment advert. In it, a soldier turns, sees a dog on the floor, and doesn’t shoot. I didn’t know then how much that moment would echo.

    By the time the credits rolled, I could barely speak.

    I didn’t cry, though my friend did. Largely over the dog, I suspect. What I felt wasn’t sadness; it was something deeper. Under the adventure narrative sits a portrayal of trauma that doesn’t declare itself. Not the loud, familiar version of PTSD that films often highlight. The quiet kind. The one most people never notice.

    It doesn’t oversell it

    That is the most striking thing about the film. It refuses to oversell trauma.

    There are no endless explanations of what is happening inside James’s head. No speeches that tell the audience he is traumatised. It lives in the subtleties. The withdrawal. Standing back from people. The distance. The way the past can suddenly sit beside the present. The instinct to protect. The exhaustion. And then the ability to keep going anyway.

    Films often get this wrong because PTSD is not always someone visibly falling apart. Sometimes it gets up in the morning. Sometimes it works. Sometimes it looks after everyone else. Sometimes it laughs. Sometimes it looks completely composed. Sometimes it becomes exceptionally capable because being capable was once necessary for survival. Sometimes it simply says “I’m fine,” and people believe it. They see someone still standing and assume the battle must be over. They do not see how much effort standing takes.

    They do not see how much effort standing takes.

    That is what Heart of the Beast shows. Not a man constantly collapsing. A man repeatedly putting himself back together.

    The military context matters. James is a former Special Forces soldier. Odin is a former combat dog with the physical scars to match. Titanium teeth, a prosthetic leg, nightmares. Many years ago, long before my nursing degree, I worked in acute mental health, and some of the people I met there were veterans. I will never forget them. I fully respect just how difficult it is for veterans. Support written for that world exists too, including Combat Stress and PTSD Resolution.

    But PTSD does not solely sit with military veterans. Trauma after war, violence, loss, accidents, childhood experiences, or repeated exposure through work is not interchangeable. The events are not identical. Some of what follows can still be frighteningly recognisable. Hypervigilance. Withdrawal. Protectiveness. The habit of functioning at a cost no one else can see. PTSD UK explains that wider picture clearly. What this film does is make that relatable to anybody who lives with post-traumatic stress disorder.

    For some people, “home” is the first room where those things do not have to be performed away. For James, that room is the wilderness, and the only other heartbeat in it is Odin’s.

    Just get back up

    There are so many points where James could have stopped. Physically. Emotionally. Psychologically. Enough had already happened. He keeps getting back up. Another obstacle, another reserve, another reason, another way through.

    Every time he got there, the trauma would come back, and he would just keep fighting. He would find a way through. Yes, it was for the dog, and for himself. But it was his trauma, the flashbacks, the haunting, that kept him going. His trauma made him push through. I got it. I really got it.

    That lands hard because trauma is not only the thing that knocks you down. Sometimes the survival mechanisms created by it become the things that make you get back up. Not because you are fearless or particularly positive or some inspirational version of “strong.” Sometimes you are absolutely exhausted. You just know how to survive. There is a difference.

    When a nervous system has spent long enough treating the world as dangerous, it learns how to function in circumstances other people might find impossible. Another crisis. Another hurdle. Something inside simply goes: Right. What now? You deal with it. Then the next thing. Every hurdle becomes another battle in a war you never volunteered to fight. A never-ending battle. It feels relentless. There’s no end to it. People look at you and say they don’t know how you do it. Sometimes neither do you. You just keep getting back up.

    This should never be romanticised. There is nothing beautiful about PTSD. There is nothing desirable about intrusive memories, avoidance, emotional numbing, or a nervous system shaped by something that should never have happened. Home should not have to mean danger you already know how to walk through.

    Human beings are still complicated. Trauma can injure someone profoundly while the survival responses developed because of it become extraordinarily difficult to switch off. Fight. Protect. Keep moving. Get everyone else safe. Deal with yourself later. That last one especially. Later does not always come.

    The person who keeps functioning can become very good at hiding how much functioning costs.

    Even when everything is falling apart, the instinct to protect remains. Protect the dog. Protect the people who matter. Keep going. Get them through it. You can be depleted and still notice everyone else. You can be drowning and still check whether the person beside you can swim. From the outside that looks like strength. Inside it can feel completely different.

    Towards the end the film itself seems to change. Towards the end the film itself seems to change. The light. The colour. The pace. Everything quieter. That strange stillness when you know you might be about to leave someone you love, or lose them. There are not always words big enough. Sometimes there are no words at all. And even then the instinct remains. Are they going to be okay? Still protecting. Still thinking about everybody else. Even when there is almost nothing left to give.

    Odin is so much more than “the dog”

    The relationship between James and Odin sits at the centre of the film. Loyalty. Dependence. Mutual protectiveness. If anywhere on that map feels like home, it is that bond. Not the landscape. The other living thing that already knows the cost.

    The film also shows, without over-explaining, that trauma does not look one way, in humans or in animals. Fear does not always look like fear. Distress does not always look like distress. It can look like withdrawal, avoidance, aggression, hypervigilance, silence, restlessness, attachment, protectiveness, shutting down, or simply behaving differently because something inside no longer feels safe. I highly respect the film for raising awareness that dogs experience these symptoms too, and display them in their own ways.

    The film lets you observe rather than lecture. That restraint is what makes it powerful.

    Why I didn’t cry and why I couldn’t speak

    There is a kind of emotional overload where tears don’t come. Everything just goes quiet. That is where I was. I couldn’t really speak. Not through tears. Through overwhelm. Through overload.

    Not because I had watched a sad film about a man and his dog. Because I had watched something that put a complicated experience on screen without constantly explaining it. The withdrawal. The isolation. The memories. The distance. The protectiveness. The exhaustion. The moments where giving up would almost have been understandable. And then getting back up. Again. Again. Again.

    My dissociation means that anything emotional that relates too closely to PTSD is something my nervous system often protects itself from. During those times I write. Or I dictate. To get it out. For processing. That is what this is.

    So todays blog prompt asked for a place that felt like home.. The honest answer is awkward. It was a dark room full of strangers, and a story that did not flinch from the silent version of a fight most people never see. Recognition can feel like home even when it is not gentle.

    The battle nobody sees

    What stays with me most is this. There are people walking around every day fighting battles nobody else can see. They do not necessarily look traumatised. They do not always cry. They do not collapse in front of you. They might be the person everybody else depends on. Working. Parenting. Laughing. Helping other people. Making plans. Getting things done. Surviving.

    Because they are functioning, people assume they are okay. Functioning and being okay are not the same thing. Sometimes functioning is simply what survival looks like. Sometimes the person everyone thinks is incredibly strong is someone who learned a very long time ago that when something knocks them down, they have to get back up.

    Functioning and being okay are not the same thing.

    I keep coming back to the title. Different people will take different things from Heart of the Beast. For me the beast was not only the wilderness, the physical danger, everything waiting outside. It was also the thing carried within. The part of trauma that can pull you backwards without warning. The memories you cannot simply decide to forget. The instinct to withdraw. The exhaustion of fighting something other people cannot see. And also that relentless survival instinct. Get up. Keep moving. Protect them. One more step.

    I didn’t leave the cinema crying. I left silent. Because for once I didn’t feel as though I had watched somebody acting out the textbook version of PTSD. I felt as though I had watched somebody understand the silent one. The one people don’t see. That is to the credit of Brad Pitt, and of David Ayer’s direction.

    It was probably the best portrayal of post-traumatic stress disorder I have ever seen in a film.

    I felt it.


    🎬 Heart of the Beast (2026)
    Directed by David Ayer. Written by Cameron Alexander. Starring Brad Pitt, J.K. Simmons, Anna Lambe, and Uber as Odin. In UK/US cinemas from 25 September 2026.

    Sources

    Heart of the Beast official site: heartofthebeastmovie.com
    Mind, Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and Trauma: mind.org.uk
    PTSD UK: ptsduk.org
    Combat Stress: combatstress.org.uk
    PTSD Resolution: ptsdresolution.org

    Deadline, Heart of the Beast review (distributor and release date): deadline.com/2026/09/heart-of-the-beast-review-brad-pitt-german-shepherd-survive-1237109761
    Empire, Heart of the Beast review: empireonline.com/movies/reviews/heart-of-the-beast
    Flickering Myth, Heart of the Beast review: flickeringmyth.com/movie-review-heart-of-the-beast-2026

    If this film, or this piece, has stirred something up

    You do not have to sit with it alone. If you are in immediate danger, call emergency services (999 in the UK, 911 in the US and Canada, 000 in Australia).

    UK and Ireland

    Samaritans: 116 123 (24/7) · samaritans.org
    Combat Stress (veterans, serving personnel and families): 0800 138 1619 · text 07537 173 683 · combatstress.org.uk
    Mind: 0300 123 3393 · mind.org.uk
    PTSD UK: ptsduk.org
    PTSD Resolution (veterans, reservists and families): 0300 302 0551 · ptsdresolution.org
    NHS 111 (England, Scotland, Wales): 111 · in Wales, press 2 for 24/7 mental health support
    Op COURAGE (NHS veterans’ mental health, England): ask your GP or search NHS Op COURAGE
    Veterans’ NHS Wales (VNHSW): ask your GP or search Veterans NHS Wales

    United States

    988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline: call or text 988 · 988lifeline.org
    Veterans Crisis Line: 988 then press 1 · text 838255 · veteranscrisisline.net
    NAMI HelpLine: 1-800-950-NAMI (6264) · nami.org
    National Center for PTSD (VA): ptsd.va.gov

    Canada

    988 Suicide Crisis Helpline: call or text 988 · 988.ca
    Canadian Mental Health Association: cmha.ca

    Australia and New Zealand

    Lifeline Australia: 13 11 14 · lifeline.org.au
    Beyond Blue: 1300 22 4636 · beyondblue.org.au
    Lifeline New Zealand: 0800 543 354 · lifeline.org.nz

    International directory

    IASP local crisis centres: iasp.info/suicidalthoughts

    If you are supporting someone else, those same numbers are for you too.

    Comments are welcome. Please do not share graphic detail about other people’s trauma, and do not use the comments as a crisis service. If you need help now, please use the numbers above.

    This is a personal reflection on a film and not clinical advice.

  • When Patterns Are Missed: Post Separation Abuse, Trauma, and the Cost of Incomplete Safeguarding

    When Patterns Are Missed: Post Separation Abuse, Trauma, and the Cost of Incomplete Safeguarding

    There is a particular kind of difficult week that only survivors of domestic abuse and coercive control truly understand.

    Not because something new has happened.

    But because something familiar has.

    The kind of familiar that pulls your nervous system straight back into survival mode before your mind has even caught up.

    I have barely slept. Some nights this week I was awake almost around the clock. Other days I could barely stay awake at all.

    That is what trauma does to a body.

    Hypervigilance.

    Adrenaline.

    Exhaustion.

    Shutdown.

    The body remembers patterns long before systems do.

    And patterns matter.

    I Recognise the Pattern Because I Lived Inside It

    For years, I watched crisis follow crisis.

    Attempts to obtain things that should never have been obtained.

    Claims of overdose.

    Talk of self harm.

    Situations that appeared suddenly, generated sympathy and concern, then receded, only to repeat.

    Each time, attention moved toward the immediate presentation.

    Each time, the history behind it seemed to disappear.

    Not once.

    Too many times to count.

    I knew the shape of it.

    I knew exactly what I was living through.

    And still, when I finally named the coercive control for what it was, I was not always believed.

    There were claims that I had exaggerated.

    Claims that I had fabricated.

    Suggestions that someone, somewhere, could confirm I had made it all up.

    There is a specific cruelty in that.

    Knowing exactly what is happening to you, naming it clearly, and still being met with doubt.

    It took me a long time to leave.

    Longer still to feel safe.

    My diagnosis of PTSD came later, once I was out, when my body finally let itself register everything it had been carrying while there was no choice but to keep going.

    And then, recently, I heard echoes of that same pattern again.

    I will not set out the detail here, and there is detail I am not free to share.

    But it was familiar enough to stop me in my tracks.

    Familiar enough to confirm, painfully, that what I lived through was never a one off, and never invented.

    Risk Rarely Sits Inside One Isolated Incident

    What I lived through is not unique.

    It is how risk so often behaves.

    Safeguarding risk is almost never contained within a single event.

    It builds.

    It repeats.

    It hides inside crises that, taken one at a time, can each be explained away.

    When the immediate crisis takes centre stage, the person who named the harm is too often recast as the problem.

    The history disappears.

    The pattern goes unexamined.

    And the protective parent is left carrying a fear that no one else seems willing to hold.

    This is precisely why cumulative history matters.

    When information is fragmented, when incidents are assessed in isolation, and when context is missing or incomplete, the result is unsafe risk assessment.

    Incomplete information creates unsafe outcomes.

    Compassion and Safeguarding Are Not Opposites

    This is not about dismissing mental health crises.

    Mental health crises deserve compassion.

    Substance misuse deserves treatment.

    People deserve support.

    But compassion and safeguarding are not mutually exclusive.

    Supporting somebody through crisis should never require minimising the risk posed to others, ignoring patterns, or displacing harm onto victims and children.

    A system can hold both truths at once.

    It must.

    Children Notice More Than Adults Realise

    Children experience these dynamics too.

    My child is safe.

    Settled.

    Protected.

    Shielded from the things that should never have touched a child’s world in the first place.

    Children notice more than adults often realise.

    They know who listens.

    They know who feels safe.

    They know when something is wrong.

    My child did not learn safety through anyone’s influence or coaching.

    There was no need.

    Safety, and the absence of it, was already understood through lived experience.

    Instability.

    Having their feelings dismissed.

    Moments that frightened them when no one was there to step in.

    What I see now is a child who is happy, settled, and clear about their own feelings.

    That clarity was never created by me.

    It was recognised by a child who already knew.

    That recognition should never have had to be theirs.

    No child should have to work out who is safe through lived experience.

    Systems should be doing that work.

    What Protection Should Not Depend On

    Protective parents should not have to fight for years to have patterns recognised.

    Women should not have to repeatedly explain cumulative risk while fragmented incidents are assessed in isolation.

    Safety should not depend on someone quietly passing on information at the right moment.

    Protection should not depend on chance.

    And survivors should not have to watch familiar cycles repeat while being told, directly or indirectly, that what they experienced was exaggerated, fabricated, misunderstood, or unproven.

    Post Separation Abuse Does Not Always End When a Relationship Does

    Sometimes it continues.

    Through systems.

    Through concealment.

    Through fractured information sharing.

    Through repeated crises.

    Through narratives that distract from established patterns.

    And through the expectation that the protective parent must keep carrying the burden of fear silently.

    I will not stay silent.

    Not because speaking is easy.

    But because women and children deserve systems that recognise patterns earlier, ask harder questions, share safeguarding concerns properly, and understand that incomplete information can create profoundly unsafe outcomes.

    Patterns matter.

    Trauma remembers them.

    Victims remember them.

    Children remember them.

    Systems must start recognising them too.

    If anything in this blog resonates with you, please know this: you are not alone.

    For years, I was told that eventually the mask would slip, that false narratives cannot be sustained forever, and that the truth has a way of surfacing. At the time, I did not find comfort in those words. Nobody else was living my life, carrying my fear, or trying to protect my child.

    And when patterns did reappear, it did not bring relief.

    It brought fear.

    Fear for my child.

    Fear of escalation.

    Fear of retaliation.

    If you are living with domestic abuse, coercive control, post separation abuse, or safeguarding concerns, support is available. In an emergency, always call 999. You can contact the National Domestic Abuse Helpline (Refuge) on 0808 2000 247, available 24 hours a day, or Women’s Aid for information and local support services. If children are at immediate risk, contact police or your local safeguarding team.

    You deserve to be heard.

    You deserve support.

    And you deserve systems that recognise patterns before harm escalates.

    You are not alone.

  • The Most Underrated People in History Are the Ones Who Told the Truth

    The Most Underrated People in History Are the Ones Who Told the Truth

    Subscribe to continue reading

    Subscribe to get access to the rest of this post and other subscriber-only content.